Use of cell salvage and HBOC-201 in a pregnant Jehovah’s Witness with sickle beta+thalassaemia undergoing emergency caesarean section
- 1 College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
- 2 Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
- 3 Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
- Correspondence to Dr Anita Rajasekhar; anita.rajasekhar@medicine.ufl.edu
Abstract
Patients with severe anaemia who refuse or cannot safely receive red cell transfusion present challenges during pregnancy, delivery and the postpartum period. Strategies including HBOC-201 (Hemopure) and intraoperative use of cell salvage have been used in non-pregnant patients to improve oxygen carrying capacity; however, these products pose unique risks in pregnant patients, those with sickle cell disease (SCD) and those undergoing caesarean section (C-section). We describe a case of a pregnant sickle beta+thalasasaemia patient who presented at 27 weeks gestation with pre-eclampsia and severe anaemia. As a Jehovah’s Witness, she declined allogenic blood transfusion. The patient successfully underwent emergent C-section with cell salvage and received HBOC-201 immediately after delivery, during the operative procedure. To our knowledge, this is the first published report documenting a Jehovah’s Witness patient with SCD who successfully received cell salvage and then HBOC-201 immediately postdelivery.
Background
Jehovah’s Witness (JW) patients typically refuse red blood cell transfusion, even in the setting of severe anaemia or major surgery. An increased mortality has been shown to correlate with declining levels of haemoglobin (Hb) in this population.1 Among JW patients, some may accept the use of minor blood fractions, intraoperative cell salvage and Hb blood substitutes, though this is a personal decision not universally agreed on by all JW patients. HBOC-201 (Hemopure), a bovine-Hb-based oxygen carrier, serves as a bridge in patients with life-threatening anaemia when blood transfusion is not an option while the body regenerates its own blood, but carries potential risks including myocardial and cerebrovascular ischaemia.2 With the same oxygen-carrying capacity as whole blood, HBOC-201 promotes both oxygen diffusion and delivery to increase oxygen transfer between red blood cells and tissues. The utility and safety of HBOC-201 in sickle cell disease (SCD) is still largely unexplored and based on case reports and small case series; given that it scavenges nitric oxide, it could potentially induce vasoconstriction and exacerbate vaso-occlusive crises.3–6
Intraoperative cell salvage is the process of collecting and washing blood shed from the operative field and reinfusing as autologous blood. Cell salvage use in patients with SCD is controversial due to the possibility of re-administering sickled blood and further reducing oxygen-carrying capacity.7 In obstetric patients, salvaged blood contamination by amniotic fluid may theoretically result in disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), emboli and pulmonary hypertension. Though, with advanced filtration techniques and a growing body of reports supporting the safety of this practice in obstetric patients, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has endorsed the use of cell salvage in obstetric haemorrhage.8
Case presentation
A gravida 1, para 0 woman in her late 20s at approximately 27 weeks gestation presented for emergency caesarean section (C-section) due to pre-eclampsia with refractory severe hypertension with elevated transaminases. Her medical history was significant for sickle beta+thalassaemia. Prepregnancy, she maintained a baseline Hb of 10–12 g/dL. She experienced multiple vaso-occlusive pain crises as a child, which were managed at home with conservative therapy. She was hospitalised once for a pain crisis 6 years prior and never received red blood cell (RBC) transfusion. During her pregnancy, she experienced more frequent pain crises and her Hb decreased to 8 g/dL. The patient is a JW and declined allogeneic blood products.
She had an uncomplicated pregnancy until 25 weeks gestation when she presented to her obstetrician for mild hypertension and a Hb of 5.1 g/dL. She was admitted to a local hospital for pre-eclampsia evaluation. After 1 week, she was transferred to our academic tertiary care centre for high-risk obstetric care. We consulted a multidisciplinary team comprised of obstetric, haematology, maternal fetal medicine, anesthesiology, blood bank and laboratory specialists, in addition to discussion with the patient and her family, to arrive at a comprehensive and individualised consensus treatment plan.
On admission to our hospital, she had a blood pressure of 175/107 mm Hg (from prepregnancy baseline <120/80), which was managed with labetalol 40 mg intravenously and magnesium sulfate 2 g/hour intravenously for seizure prophylaxis. Admission laboratory findings were notable for aspartate aminotransferase (AST) of 202 IU/L, alanine transaminase (ALT) of 79 IU/L, lactate dehydrogenase of 1109 IU/L, total bilirubin of 2.6 mg/dL, ferritin of 946 ng/mL and platelets of 148 thou/mm (table 1). Hb at admission was 6.4 g/dL (from baseline 10 g/dL; figure 1). Random urinary protein/creatinine ratio was 1.39 mg/mg. She was diagnosed with pre-eclampsia/haemolysis with elevated liver enzymes and low platelets (HELLP). Admission pelvic ultrasound showed fetal growth restriction with absent end diastolic flow. In preparation for emergent delivery for pre-eclampsia/HELLP, the patient was given two doses of betamethasone for fetal lung maturity.
Admission laboratory values compared with baseline and nadir or highest values during 11-day admission
Reference range | Admission | Nadir (N) or highest (H) | Baseline (1 month following discharge) | |
Haemoglobin (g/dL) | 12.0–16.0 | 6.4 | 4.2 (N) | 10.2 |
Haptoglobin (mg/dL) | 40–215 | <30 | Not repeated | Not available |
Platelet count (×109 /L) | 150–450 | 148 | 99 (N) | 303 |
Fibrinogen (mg/dL) | 173–454 | 691 | Not repeated | Not available |
Prothrombin time (s) | 9.1–13.5 | 10.4 | Not repeated | Not available |
PTT (s) | 25–38 | 32 | Not repeated | Not available |
INR | 0.8–1.1 | 0.9 | Not repeated | Not available |
Lactate dehydrogenase (IU/L) | 135–225 | 1109 | 1360 (H) | Not available |
Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.38–1.02 | 0.84 | 0.96 (H) | 0.93 |
Total bilirubin (mg/dL) | 0.0–1.0 | 2.6 | 2.6 (H) | 1.4 |
Alkaline phosphatase (IU/L) | 33–133 | 162 | 162 (H) | 66 |
AST (IU/L) | 0–37 | 202 | 202 (H) | 28 |
ALT (IU/L) | 0–35 | 79 | 79 (H) | 23 |
Glucose (mg/dL) | 65–99 | 77 | 136 (H) | 102 |
Iron (µg/dL) | 35–150 | 111 | Not repeated | 81 |
Transferrin (mg/dL) | 200–360 | 289 | Not repeated | 213 |
TIBC (µg/dL) | 225–430 | 405 | Not repeated | 298 |
Iron saturation (%) | 20–55 | 27 | Not repeated | 27 |
Ferritin (ng/mL) | 11–307 | 946 | Not repeated | 142.8 |
Vitamin B12 (pg/mL) | 180–914 | >1500 | Not repeated | 884 |
-
ALT, alanine transaminase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; INR, international normalized ratio; PTT, partial thromboplastin time; TIBC, total iron-binding capacity.
Haemoglobin trends during inpatient stay. Timeline of the patient’s haemoglobin level (g/dL) after transfer to our hospital in response to caesarean section (C-section) and treatment with HBOC-201 and other therapies. If multiple haemoglobin levels were reported on a single day, averaged values are plotted, with the exception of admission day 3 where all values are shown given that this was the day of C-section. UF indicates ‘University of Florida,’ our institution.
Prior to C-section, her wishes were clarified with regard to blood product administration. She declined transfusion of any allogeneic whole blood components but was willing to accept fractions such as albumin, as well as intraoperative cell salvage and HBOC-201.
The C-section was performed under spinal anaesthesia with 12 mg of hyperbaric 0.75% bupivacaine mixed with 20 µg of fentanyl and 100 µg of morphine. The magnesium infusion was discontinued on arrival in the operating room (OR) due to a supratherapeutic level. Intravenous volume expansion with plasma-lyte A and albumin was started as soon as the patient arrived in the OR. No sedatives were given. Supplemental oxygen was provided via nasal cannula at 2 L/min. Multiple measures were taken to avoid hypothermia, including increasing forced air warmer, warmed intravenous fluid and warm blankets.
Meticulous surgical care to ensure haemostasis was practiced. After membrane rupture, clear amniotic fluid was suctioned out of the surgical field to minimise incorporation during cell salvage. After delivery of the neonate and placenta, cell salvage was initiated. The rest of the surgery remained uncomplicated with an estimated blood loss of 525 mL, which was saved using cell salvage. Salvaged blood was washed and filtered to minimise amniotic fluid contamination, but not assessed for morphological changes such as hypoxia-induced sickling or haemolysis prior to infusion. A total volume of 125 mL salvaged blood was immediately transfused back to the patient through a warmed intravenous line. The haematocrit level of the salvaged blood was not measured, but likely very dilute due to severe baseline anaemia, as her Hb was 5.2 g/dL prior to C-section. After transfusion of the salvaged blood, point-of-care venous blood gas failed to report a Hb level. A complete blood count drawn at the same time later reported a Hb of 4.2 g/dL. This roughly 1 g/dL decrease in Hb was likely multifactorial and owing to blood draws, operative blood loss and a net fluid intake of 500 mL. One unit of HBOC-201 was then transfused in the OR without adverse reactions. The patient remained haemodynamically stable throughout the surgery. The newborn weighed 775 g with Apgar scores of 4 and 7 at 1 min and 5 min after birth, respectively.
The patient was transported to the intensive care unit (ICU) after the surgery for postoperative care. A second unit of HBOC-201 was administered on arrival to the ICU. On a follow-up complete blood count, the Hb increased to 4.9 g/dL. She had no signs of haemolysis postoperatively. The patient received acetaminophen 650 mg orally and oxycodone 5 mg orally, every 4 hours as needed for pain relief. Labetalol orally was continued to maintain a systolic blood pressure less than 160 mm Hg. She was given ferrous sulfate 325 mg orally daily with vitamin C (iron was not provided intravenously per patient request), folate 1 mg orally daily, vitamin B12 1000 μg IM daily and epoetin alfa 20 000 units SQ daily (until Hb >7 g/dL) as per our institution’s protocol to support red cell production for a JW patient with severe anaemia. The patient did not experience severe adverse reactions to HBOC-201 nor to the cell salvage product. Additional units of HBOC-201 were not administered given the patient’s postoperative haemodynamic stability and lack of end organ complications, as well as out of consideration for the patient’s plan to breastfeed her newborn, given the lack of data surrounding HBOC-201 administration in breastfeeding mothers. Phlebotomy was minimised and blood was drawn in paediatric tubes to limit iatrogenic blood loss. Her Hb steadily increased throughout her inpatient stay, and on postoperative day 9, she was discharged with a Hb of 6.6 g/dL, AST of 23 IU/L, ALT of 9 IU/L, total bilirubin of 2.2 mg/dL and blood pressure of 121/81 mm Hg.
Outcome and follow-up
At 1-month follow-up, she had recovered well and reported continuation of vitamin C, vitamin B12, folic acid and multivitamin with iron. Her blood pressure had remained stable in the 120s/80s since her discharge, and her Hb was 10.2 g/dL.
Discussion
To our knowledge, this is the first case documenting a pregnant JW patient with SCD to receive HBOC-201 in the immediate post-partum period. Previous case reports have explored the use of HBOC-201 in pregnant rats and beagles, but none have documented its use in human pregnancy. There lacks safety data surrounding the use of HBOC-201 in human pregnancy, though it has been studied in animal models.9 10 Few cases documenting the use of HBOC-201 in patients with SCD have been reported, as allogenic blood transfusion is often available. One of the earliest cases reported safe and effective use of HBOC-201 in a 23-month-old JW with SCD presenting with heart failure due to severe haemolytic anaemia.11 In addition, a retrospective study of 10 patients, two with SCD, who received high cumulative doses of HBOC-201 (≥ 10 u) reported no severe adverse effects nor any long-term anaemia-related morbidities.6 A similar case series of three patients with SCD who were administered HBOC-201 reported two patients who developed methaemoglobinaemia, treated with ascorbic acid and two patients who developed transient hypertension. These adverse reactions were considered minor.12 Methaemoglobinaemia may arise as HBOC-201 quickly increases oxygen delivery, outpacing the reducing capacity of iron from the ferric to the ferrous state. Our patient’s venous methaemoglobin level was measured perioperative and postoperative, but never exceeded 7.5%.
HBOC-201 has been studied more extensively in non-pregnant patients and in those without haemoglobinopathies under the Expanded Access programme, allowing it to be trialled in patients who decline transfusions due to their religious beliefs. After a 2008 meta-analysis correlated Hb-based blood substitutes with an increased risk of death and myocardial infarction, all HBOC trials were suspended.13 However, 1 year later, an appeal based on several editorials questioning the validity of that study overturned the suspension.14–16 A 2021 literature review documented 12 case reports and 14 clinical trials which largely supported HBOC-201 as a safe and efficacious alternative when RBC transfusion is not available.17 One multi-centre clinical trial of fifty-four patients with life-threatening anaemia who received 60–300 g HBOC-201 found no serious adverse events, and that survival was more likely with earlier delivery of HBOC-201, limiting the duration of severe anaemia.18 A different study which reviewed 726 patients from phase 1 to 3 clinical trials of HBOC-201 concluded that it was well tolerated and not associated with cardiac ischaemic events.19 Case reports of HBOC-201 in JW patients have affirmed its safety and efficacy in this population.20–22 Based on our review of the literature and our single case, HBOC-201 may be a useful option for JW patients who do not wish to accept autologous blood transfusion.
The use of intraoperative cell salvage in patients with haemoglobinopathies and those undergoing C-section is controversial due to concerns about re-infusing abnormal red blood cells and contamination by amniotic fluid and fetal blood cells, respectively. The latter carries risks of DIC, pulmonary hypertension and amniotic fluid emboli, which may be mitigated by washing and filtering the autologous blood using leukocyte-removing filters.23 While no clinical trial data exists to demonstrate the safety of cell salvage in patients with SCD, previous case reports support its safety and efficacy.24 25 In this population, one must consider the increased risk of sickling and haemolysis when processing salvaged deoxygenated blood. One report of cell salvage use in a patient with sickle cell trait (SCT) found that 50% of the patient’s blood had sickled and was therefore nonviable for reinfusion.26 One report documenting two patients with SCT noted 15–20% sickled RBCs in one case and 20% altered, but not sickled, RBCs in the other and both patients safely received autologous blood transfusion without complication.27 In our patient, the blood loss was limited to a short period of time and the salvaged blood was transfused back to the patient as soon as possible to minimise hypoxia-induced sickling and haemolysis. For massive blood loss over a long period, haemolysis may have significant clinical impact. In addition, salvaged blood does not contain clotting factors or platelets needed in coagulopathic patients.
Despite these successful reports of cell salvage in patients with SCD, our case was complicated by increased intraoperative blood loss associated with emergent C-section without the option for red cell transfusion. One concern unique to cell salvage during C-section is that maternal blood is hypercoagulable, potentially leading to agglutination after being collected. This has been lessened by increasing the concentraion of heparin to 50 IU/ mL in pregnant patients, compared with 30 IU/mL in non-obstetric patients.23 In one case of a patient with SCD requiring urgent C-section secondary to HELLP syndrome, salvaged blood could not be re-infused due to haemolysis.28 This underscores the importance of monitoring salvaged blood for haemolysis and/or sickling, and effective communication and coordination between clinical teams to execute a contingency plan if cell salvage fails intraoperatively in a patient who cannot accept red cell transfusion. As a complication in our case, thalassaemic red blood cells are prone to haemolysis during salvaged blood processing due to decreased membrane stability. A previous case that utilised cell salvage in a patient with beta thalassaemia undergoing C-section found increased haemolysis, but this was mitigated by increasing the saline wash volume from 1000 to 1500 mL.29
Our case describes the perioperative management of a pregnant JW patient with sickle beta+thalassaemia, severe anaemia and expected intraoperative blood loss, who declined red cell transfusion for religious reasons. With a nadir Hb level of 4.2 g/dL which returned after surgery, it is plausible that HBOC-201 was not needed. Given its limited clinical use, there are no clear guidelines detailing HBOC-201’s indications and dosing, leaving these decisions to the judgement of the clinician who must weigh the severity of the anaemia and clinical symptoms, the patient’s unique risk factors and the potential adverse effects of HBOC-201. This case highlights the need for a multidisciplinary team approach to ensure the best outcomes for these complex patients.
Learning points
-
There is growing evidence that HBOC-201 may be a viable option for Jehovah’s Witness patients who do not wish to accept autologous blood transfusion.
-
Cell salvage may be used with caution in sickle cell patients, though it should be adequately washed with saline to mitigate risk of sickling and/or haemolysis of re-infused blood.
-
Cell salvage may be used with caution during caesarean section, though amniotic fluid should be filtered out to limit risks of disseminated intravascular coagulation, emboli and pulmonary hypertension.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Footnotes
-
Contributors JF put together a draft of the report and made the figure and table. SP, AR and MSZ were involved in the patient’s haematological care and contributed details/wrote sections related to the use of Hemopure in this patient. SS performed the anesthesia for the C-section, and provided details/wrote sections related to the use of cell salvage in this patient.
-
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
-
Case reports provide a valuable learning resource for the scientific community and can indicate areas of interest for future research. They should not be used in isolation to guide treatment choices or public health policy.
-
Competing interests None declared.
-
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
- © BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
References
Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer